Samsung C400
|
Philips Xenium 9@98
|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung C400 vs Philips Xenium 9@98
Share
Comparing the Samsung C400 vs Philips Xenium 9@98 across storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Storage: Philips Xenium 9@98 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Samsung C400 offers 1 GB, making Philips Xenium 9@98 the better option for storage.
|
Samsung C400
|
Philips Xenium 9@98
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
01 Sep, 2006
|
01 Jan, 2005
|
Display
|
LCD
|
N/A
|
|
160.00x 160 pixels px
|
80.00x 80 pixels , 5 lines px
|
Rear Camera
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
1.8 MB
|
8 MB
|
User Feedback
Display
Display Type
|
LCD
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
160.00x 160 pixels px
|
80.00x 80 pixels 5 lines px
|
Design
Height
|
85.50 mm
|
107.00 mm
|
Width
|
43.40 mm
|
45.00 mm
|
Thickness
|
16.00 mm
|
19.20 mm
|
Weight
|
85 grams
|
94 grams
|
Form Factor
|
Clamshell
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
N/A
|
Battery
TalkTime
|
Up to 6(2G)
|
Up to 7(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
1.8 MB
|
8 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Single SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
No
|
No
|
Bluetooth
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Music
|
Yes Music Formats: No
|
Yes Music Formats: No
|
Sensors
Java
|
Yes MIDP 2.0
|
No
|
Browser
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Other Facilities
|
N/A
|
Facilities
|