Samsung C400 vs Philips Xenium 9@9a

Comparing the Samsung C400 vs Philips Xenium 9@9a across storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Storage: Philips Xenium 9@9a offers higher internal storage with 2 GB, while Samsung C400 offers 1 GB, making Philips Xenium 9@9a the better option for storage.

Samsung C400

(Discontinued)

Philips Xenium 9@9a

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Sep, 2006

01 Mar, 2006

Display

LCD	OLED
160.00x 160 pixels px	27.00x 27 mm px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

N/A

Storage

1.8 MB

2 MB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

OLED

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels px

27.00x 27 mm px

Design

Height

85.50 mm

99.70 mm

Width

43.40 mm

43.50 mm

Thickness

16.00 mm

86.00 mm

Weight

85 grams

128 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

N/A

Battery

TalkTime

Up to 6(2G)

Up to 10(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

1.8 MB

2 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Facilities