Samsung C400 vs Philips Xenium 9@9d

Comparing the Samsung C400 vs Philips Xenium 9@9d across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Philips Xenium 9@9d offers a higher rear camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Samsung C400 offers 0.3 MP, making Philips Xenium 9@9d better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Philips Xenium 9@9d offers higher internal storage with 18 GB, while Samsung C400 offers 1 GB, making Philips Xenium 9@9d the better option for storage.

Samsung C400

(Discontinued)

Philips Xenium 9@9d

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Sep, 2006

01 Mar, 2006

Display

LCD	N/A
160.00x 160 pixels px	160.00x 160 pixels px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

Storage

1.8 MB

18 MB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels px

Design

Height

85.50 mm

108.00 mm

Width

43.40 mm

45.00 mm

Thickness

16.00 mm

18.50 mm

Weight

85 grams

96 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A	Yes LED Flash

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

TalkTime

Up to 6(2G)

Up to 8(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

1.8 MB

18 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Facilities