Samsung C6625 vs Micromax Q7

Comparing the Samsung C6625 vs Micromax Q7 across camera, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Samsung C6625 and Micromax Q7 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: Micromax Q7 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while Samsung C6625 offers 100 GB, making Micromax Q7 the better option for storage.

User Rating: Samsung C6625 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Micromax Q7 has a rating of 2.9.

Samsung C6625

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q7

₹7,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Mar, 2009

15 May, 2010

Display

LCD	N/A
240.00x 240 pixels , 2.6 inches px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

800 mAh

Storage

100 MB

78 MB

User Ratings

4/5

(1 rating)

2.9/5

(28 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Resolution

240.00x 240 pixels 2.6 inches px

320x240 px

Design

Height

113.30 mm

110 mm

Width

63.00 mm

59 mm

Thickness

11.90 mm

10.70 mm

Weight

109 grams

100 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

128x96 @ 15

N/A

Battery

Capacity

N/A

800 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 7(2G)

Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

100 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No	Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/AAC/AAC+/WMA/OGG/AMR player and WMV/MP4 player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV Background Music Playback Built in Yamaha Audio Amplifier

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Voice memo T9