Samsung Champ GT-C3300 vs Mercury Roxy

Comparing the Samsung Champ GT-C3300 vs Mercury Roxy across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Samsung Champ GT-C3300 and Mercury Roxy feature a 1.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Mercury Roxy offers a higher battery capacity with 1200 mAh, while Samsung Champ GT-C3300 offers 1000 mAh, making Mercury Roxy better for longer battery life.

Samsung Champ GT-C3300

(Discontinued)

Mercury Roxy

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

04 Jun, 2010

30 Oct, 2010

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

N/A

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

167 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

34.45 %

N/A

Design

Height

96.3 mm

N/A

Width

53.8 mm

N/A

Thickness

12.90 mm

N/A

Weight

80 grams

85 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

220x176 @ 10

N/A

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

1200 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 12.03(2G)

Up to 6(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

30 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2.1

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: MPEG4 H.263

N/A

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 WMA eAAC+ with 3.5 mm audio jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Other Sensors

Accelerometer

N/A

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 contacts Photocall

Yes

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 250

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

Organizer Voice memo T9

Alarm Calculator Calender