Samsung Champ GT-C3300 vs Zink L700

Comparing the Samsung Champ GT-C3300 vs Zink L700 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Samsung Champ GT-C3300 and Zink L700 offer the same screen size of 2.4 inches and feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Zink L700 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3 MP, while Samsung Champ GT-C3300 offers 1.3 MP, making Zink L700 better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Zink L700 offers a higher battery capacity with 1050 mAh, while Samsung Champ GT-C3300 offers 1000 mAh, making Zink L700 better for longer battery life.

Samsung Champ GT-C3300

(Discontinued)

Zink L700

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

04 Jun, 2010

25 Nov, 2011

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

Pixel Density

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

34.45 %

N/A

Design

Height

96.3 mm

N/A

Width

53.8 mm

N/A

Thickness

12.90 mm

N/A

Weight

80 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

220x176 @ 10

N/A

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

1050 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 12.03(2G)

N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

30 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2.1

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: MPEG4 H.263

N/A

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 WMA eAAC+ with 3.5 mm audio jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Other Sensors

Accelerometer

N/A

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 contacts Photocall

Yes

SMS

Yes

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

Organizer Voice memo T9

N/A