Samsung E215 vs Micromax GC275

Comparing the Samsung E215 vs Micromax GC275 across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Samsung E215 and Micromax GC275 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Samsung E215

(Discontinued)

Micromax GC275

₹3,899

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2009

24 May, 2010

Display

N/A	1.8 inches (4.57 cm)
LCD	LCD
160.00x 160 pixels , 2.0 inches px	128x160 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

800 mAh

Storage

12 MB

N/A

User Ratings

N/A	3/5 (2 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	1.8 inches (4.57 cm)

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels 2.0 inches px

128x160 px

Pixel Density

N/A

114 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

21.34 %

Design

Height

90.60 mm

107.7 mm

Width

44.70 mm

44.37 mm

Thickness

17.90 mm

14.50 mm

Weight

89 grams

100 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

800 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 6(2G)

Up to 6.6(2G)

Storage

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/eAAC+ player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with Background Music Playback

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A

Yes

SMS

N/A

Yes

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Image Viewer STK/UTK Voice Mail Speed dial