Samsung E370 vs Micromax Q75

Comparing the Samsung E370 vs Micromax Q75 across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q75 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Samsung E370 offers 1.3 MP, making Micromax Q75 better for rear camera photography.

Samsung E370

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q75

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Mar, 2006

02 Sep, 2010

Display

N/A	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
LCD	LCD
160.00x 160 pixels , 1.8 inches px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1200 mAh

Storage

40 MB

N/A

User Ratings

N/A	3.5/5 (120 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels 1.8 inches px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

24.06 %

Design

Height

86.00 mm

115 mm

Width

43.10 mm

64.5 mm

Thickness

20.40 mm

12.20 mm

Weight

85 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1200 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3.5(2G)

Up to 7(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

40 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/AAC player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV) with Background Music Playback

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Email

N/A	Yes Zenga Mail

Other Facilities

N/A

EMS STK