Samsung E500 vs Micromax E390

Comparing the Samsung E500 vs Micromax E390 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Samsung E500 and Micromax E390 feature a 1.3 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: Samsung E500 offers higher internal storage with 60 GB, while Micromax E390 offers 19 GB, making Samsung E500 the better option for storage.

Samsung E500

(Discontinued)

Micromax E390

₹4,199

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 May, 2006

13 Feb, 2012

Display

N/A	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)
LCD	TFT
220.00x 220 pixels , 1.76 inches px	240x400 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1000 mAh

Storage

60 MB

19.9 MB

User Ratings

N/A	2.7/5 (101 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

TFT

Screen Size

N/A	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)

Resolution

220.00x 220 pixels 1.76 inches px

240x400 px

Pixel Density

N/A

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

45 %

Display Colour

N/A

262k

Design

Height

85.00 mm

98.1 mm

Width

44.50 mm

50.5 mm

Thickness

21.90 mm

15.30 mm

Weight

77 grams

83.7 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Image Resolution

N/A	1280 x 1024 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 6(2G)

Up to 5 Hours(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

60 MB

19.9 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

N/A	Yes Video Formats: 3GP MPEG4

Ring Tone

N/A	Music ringtones Polyphonic ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/AAC/AAC+ player

Yes Music Formats: AMR MIDI MP3

Sensors

Games

N/A

Yes

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

N/A

Browser

Yes

Yes WAP

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 2000 Entries Limited

SMS

N/A

Yes