|
76%
Samsung Galaxy A07
₹10,989
|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
₹16,442
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A07 vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A07 vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Samsung Galaxy A07 and Xiaomi Redmi 14C run at the same processing speed of 2.2 GHz.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers a screen size of 6.88 inches, while Samsung Galaxy A07 offers 6.7 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi 14C features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy A07's PLS LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A07 and Xiaomi Redmi 14C feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A07 and Xiaomi Redmi 14C feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers a higher battery capacity with 5160 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy A07 offers 5000 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy A07 and Xiaomi Redmi 14C offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A07 and Xiaomi Redmi 14C both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
Samsung Galaxy A07
₹10,989
@ Amazon
|
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
₹16,442
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
30 Sep, 2025
|
10 Jan, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
|
PLS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5160 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.7/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(1,125 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(10,230 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
438,871
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹10,989
|
₹16,442
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 30, 2025
(Official)
|
Jan 10, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v14
|
OS Updates
|
6 Year
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
6 Year
|
4 Years
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 1.95 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Adreno 613
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
438,871
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
8.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
34.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
PLS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
262 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.65 %
|
84.18 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
167.4 mm
|
171.88 mm
|
Width
|
77.4 mm
|
77.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.6 mm
|
8.22 mm
|
Weight
|
184 grams
|
205 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Film Camera |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30/60 fps
HD @120 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5160 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 23m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 23m 45s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.3
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
|
₹10,989
|
₹16,442
|
Related Comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A07
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi A4
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 13 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
POCO M7
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
POCO C75
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
POCO C71
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Moto G06 Power
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Itel Zeno 100
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
iQOO Neo 10R
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
vivo X300 FE