|
75%
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
Motorola One Action
₹8,766
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Motorola One Action
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Motorola One Action across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Action scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,398, while Samsung Galaxy A50 scores 5,372, making Motorola One Action the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while Motorola One Action offers 6.3 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Motorola One Action's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 25 MP, while Motorola One Action offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while Motorola One Action offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while Motorola One Action offers 3500 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Motorola One Action offers 128 GB, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy A50 and Motorola One Action equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A50 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Motorola One Action has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Motorola One Action
₹8,766
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
02 Mar, 2019
|
30 Aug, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
16 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
12 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(100,914 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(30,589 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
143,399
AnTuTu Score
|
143,309
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 31m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 02, 2019
(Official)
|
Aug 30, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Android One
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
143,399
|
143,309
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
16.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
21:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
435 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.97 %
|
81.52 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.6 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
158.5 mm
|
160.1 mm
|
Width
|
74.5 mm
|
71.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
9.15 mm
|
Weight
|
166 grams
|
176 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.726 mm focal length CMOS image sensor |
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera13 mm focal length |
16 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
5288 x 3968 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera25 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS |
12 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 23 Hours(3G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 31m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 6m 2s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.335 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Rear
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|