Samsung Galaxy Ace
₹9,200
(Discontinued)
|
51%
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy Ace vs Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Ace vs Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.0 GHz, while Samsung Galaxy Ace runs at 0.8 GHz, making Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 the better performer.
Display: Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Samsung Galaxy Ace offers 3.5 inches, making Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 the larger display of the two. Both Samsung Galaxy Ace and Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Samsung Galaxy Ace offers 5 MP, making Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 better for rear camera photography.
Battery: Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy Ace offers 1350 mAh, making Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy Ace offers higher internal storage with 158 GB, while Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers 1 GB, making Samsung Galaxy Ace the better option for storage.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy Ace
₹9,200
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
51%
|
Release Date
|
09 Feb, 2011
|
03 Jun, 2012
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon S1
|
Snapdragon S1
|
|
(upto 800 MHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
278 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
320x480 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1350 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Storage
|
158 MB
|
1 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(537 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Custom UI
|
TouchWiz UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
|
Processor
|
Single core, 800 MHz, ARM 11
|
1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 200
|
Adreno 200
|
RAM
|
278 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x480 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
165 ppi
|
245 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
54.28 %
|
60.82 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
112.4 mm
|
119.8 mm
|
Width
|
59.9 mm
|
60.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.50 mm
|
9.9 mm
|
Weight
|
113 grams
|
129.7 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
640x480 @ 24 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1350 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6.5 Hours(3G) / Up to 11 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 6 Hours(3G) / Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
158 MB
|
1 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Single SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
SIM1: Mini
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.1
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
Document Viewer
|