|
77%
Samsung Galaxy F23 5G
₹12,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy F23 5G vs Moto g52
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F23 5G vs Moto g52 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto g52 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,574, while Samsung Galaxy F23 5G scores 1,560, making Moto g52 the better performer.
Display: Both Samsung Galaxy F23 5G and Moto g52 offer the same screen size of 6.6 inches, but Moto g52 features a P-OLED display compared to Samsung Galaxy F23 5G's TFT, making Moto g52 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy F23 5G and Moto g52 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto g52 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F23 5G offers 8 MP, making Moto g52 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto g52 delivers longer battery life with 17h 05m, while Samsung Galaxy F23 5G delivers 11h 28m, making Moto g52 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Moto g52 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F23 5G offers 128 GB, making Moto g52 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy F23 5G and Moto g52 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F23 5G and Moto g52 both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
Samsung Galaxy F23 5G
₹12,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
Moto g52
₹13,990
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
08 Mar, 2022
|
25 Apr, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 750G
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
P-OLED
|
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
33W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(47,944 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(19,276 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
297,179
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
11h 28m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 05m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
|
₹13,990
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 08, 2022
(Official)
|
Apr 25, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v12
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
4 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 570 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 570 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 619
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
297,179
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
35.9 %
|
25.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
P-OLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
400 ppi
|
399 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.53 %
|
87.85 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.5 mm
|
160.9 mm
|
Width
|
77 mm
|
74.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
198 grams
|
169 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Slow Motion
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 44 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 28m
|
17h 05m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 18m 41s
|
3h 26m 27s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N28 / N66
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.240 W/kg
|
Head: 1.05 W/kg Body: 1.29 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
|
₹13,990
|