|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G vs POCO C85x
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G vs POCO C85x across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while POCO C85x runs at 2.2 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: POCO C85x offers a screen size of 6.9 inches, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 6.7 inches, making POCO C85x the larger display of the two. Both Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G and POCO C85x feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while POCO C85x offers 32 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G and POCO C85x feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO C85x offers a higher battery capacity with 6300 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 6000 mAh, making POCO C85x better for longer battery life.
Storage: POCO C85x offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making POCO C85x the better option for storage.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while POCO C85x has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
11 Mar, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Unisoc T8300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4.0 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1600x720 px (QHD (2k))
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
32 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6300 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.2/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(4,871 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(3,054 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Mar 10, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
6 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
6 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
|
Unisoc T8300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4.0 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
532,024
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
30.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
373
|
N/A
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
32.6 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1600x720 px (QHD (2k))
|
Peak Brightness
|
800 nits
|
810 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
810 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
254 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.65 %
|
84.36 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
167.4 mm
|
171.56 mm
|
Width
|
77.4 mm
|
79.47 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.2 mm
|
8.15 mm
|
Weight
|
191 grams
|
210 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
32 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoom |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @120 fps
|
Full HD @30/60 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 51m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 14m 0s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/be) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.3
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A07 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
OPPO K14x 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
realme P4 Lite 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F16 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M36
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
POCO M7 Plus
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Ai+ Nova 2 5G
POCO C85x
POCO C85 5G
POCO C85x
POCO M7 Plus
POCO C85x
POCO M7