|
84%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
₹189,999
(Out of Stock)
|
98%
OPPO Find X9 Ultra
₹169,999
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO Find X9 Ultra scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 10,574, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 scores 2,869, making OPPO Find X9 Ultra the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 offers a screen size of 7.6 inches, while OPPO Find X9 Ultra offers 6.82 inches, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a Dynamic AMOLED display compared to OPPO Find X9 Ultra's LTPO AMOLED, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: OPPO Find X9 Ultra offers a higher rear camera resolution with 200 MP, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 offers 12 MP, making OPPO Find X9 Ultra better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: OPPO Find X9 Ultra offers a higher front camera resolution with 50 MP, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 offers 10 MP, making OPPO Find X9 Ultra better for front camera photography.
Battery: OPPO Find X9 Ultra delivers longer battery life with 17h 07m, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 delivers 7h 22m, making OPPO Find X9 Ultra the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: OPPO Find X9 Ultra offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 offers 256 GB, making OPPO Find X9 Ultra the better option for storage.
User Rating: OPPO Find X9 Ultra receives a higher user rating of 4.7, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
₹189,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO Find X9 Ultra
₹169,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
84%
|
98%
|
Release Date
|
13 Sep, 2020
|
28 May, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 865 Plus
|
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
|
|
Octa Core (upto 3.09 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 4.61 GHz)
|
|
12 GB RAM
|
12 GB RAM
|
| Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
Main Display
|
|
|
|
7.6 inches (19.3 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
|
Dynamic AMOLED
|
LTPO AMOLED
|
|
1768x2208 px
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Cover Display
|
6.23 inches (15.82 cm)
|
N/A
|
|
816x2260 px
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
200 MP
Primary Camera (upto 10x Optical Zoom)
|
|
12 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
12 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
200 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
|
N/A
|
50 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 10x Optical Zoom)
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
10 MP + 10 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
50 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
7050 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
100W Super VOOC Charging
|
|
Wireless Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
512 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(145 ratings)
|
4.7/5
(47 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
587,152
AnTuTu Score
|
4,033,382
AnTuTu Score
|
|
7h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 07m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹169,999
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 13, 2020
(Official)
|
May 21, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
5 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Year
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Best In Class
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SM8850-AC
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
3.09 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585 |
Octa core
4.61 GHz, Dual core, Oryon 3.63 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
7 nm
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 650
|
Adreno 840
|
RAM
|
12 GB
|
12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR5X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
587,152
|
4,033,382
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
14.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
7,148
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
9.7 %
|
9.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Dynamic AMOLED
|
LTPO AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
7.6 inches (19.3 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1768x2208 px
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
3600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
19.8:9
|
Pixel Density
|
372 ppi
|
510 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
167.91 %
|
89.42 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass Glass Victus 2
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
94.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.2 mm
|
163.16 mm
|
Width
|
68 mm
|
76.97 mm
|
Thickness
|
13.8 mm
|
8.65 mm
|
Weight
|
279 grams
|
236 grams
|
Form Factor
|
Foldable Touch
|
N/A
|
Dimensions
|
Folded: 159.2 x 68 x 13.8 mm
Unfolded: 159.2 x 128.2 x 6.9 mm |
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Best In Class
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.826 mm focal length 1/1.7" sensor size 1.8µm pixel size |
200 MP
Primary Camera30x Digital Zoom 10x Optical Zoomf/1.523 mm focal length 1/1.12" sensor size LYT 901 |
|
12 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera52 mm focal length 1/3.6" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
50 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera14 mm focal length 1/1.95" sensor size |
|
12 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
200 MP
f/2.2 Telephoto Camera70 mm focal length 1/1.28" sensor size |
|
N/A
|
50 MP
f/3.5 Telephoto Camera230 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
30 x Digital Zoom
10 x Optical Zoom |
Video Recording
|
4k @60 fps
Full HD @240 fps HD @960 fps |
8k @30 fps
4k @30/60/120 fps Full HD @30/60/120 fps HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Video HDR |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Best In Class
|
Resolution
|
10 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size 1.22µm pixel size |
50 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera21 mm focal length |
|
10 MP
f/2.2 Camera26 mm focal length 1.22µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
7050 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 100W Super VOOC Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
Yes
|
Yes 50W Wireless Charging
|
Wireless Reverse Charging
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
7h 22m
|
17h 07m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 18m 11s
|
50m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 GB
|
512 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
N/A
|
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N20 / N25 / N26 / N28 / N66 / N71 / N75
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 / N79 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 1500(band 32) / 700(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 600(Band 71) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) / 1700(band 66) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/be/ax) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v6.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Ultrasonic
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Barometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹169,999
@ Amazon
|