|
70%
Samsung Galaxy M10
₹8,290
(Discontinued)
|
73%
POCO C65
₹8,499
@Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M10 vs POCO C65
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M10 vs POCO C65 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy M10 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 3,612, while POCO C65 scores 1,031, making Samsung Galaxy M10 the better performer.
Display: POCO C65 offers a screen size of 6.74 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M10 offers 6.22 inches, making POCO C65 the larger display of the two. POCO C65 features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy M10's TFT, making POCO C65 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: POCO C65 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M10 offers 13 MP, making POCO C65 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: POCO C65 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M10 offers 5 MP, making POCO C65 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M10 delivers longer battery life with 19h 13m, while POCO C65 delivers 12h 15m, making Samsung Galaxy M10 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy M10 offers higher internal storage with 16 GB, while POCO C65 offers 128 GB, making Samsung Galaxy M10 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: POCO C65 receives a higher expert rating of 7.6 from the editorial team, while Samsung Galaxy M10 is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO C65 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Samsung Galaxy M10 has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M10
₹8,290
(Discontinued)
|
✕
POCO C65
₹8,499
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
70%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
05 Feb, 2019
|
18 Dec, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3400 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(24,423 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(105,093 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
63,935
AnTuTu Score
|
238,770
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 13m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 15m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹8,499
@ Flipkart
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Dec 18, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v13
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
|
MediaTek Helio G85
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.6 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
14 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T830
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
63,935
|
238,770
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
21.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
39.6 %
|
2.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
450 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
267 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.68 %
|
82.45 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
155.6 mm
|
168 mm
|
Width
|
75.6 mm
|
78 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
8.19 mm
|
Weight
|
163 grams
|
192 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/3.1" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle28 mm focal length 1.28µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Film Camera |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.0 Primary CameraCMOS 1µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3400 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 24 Hours(3G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 13m
|
12h 15m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 30m 32s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.238 W/kg
|
Head: 0.809 W/kg Body: 0.856 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹8,499
@ Flipkart
|