|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M30s
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
Motorola One Macro
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M30s vs Motorola One Macro
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M30s vs Motorola One Macro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Macro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,450, while Samsung Galaxy M30s scores 1,273, making Motorola One Macro the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy M30s offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while Motorola One Macro offers 6.2 inches, making Samsung Galaxy M30s the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a Super AMOLED display compared to Motorola One Macro's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy M30s the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M30s offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Motorola One Macro offers 13 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M30s better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy M30s offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Motorola One Macro offers 8 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M30s better for front camera photography.
Battery: Motorola One Macro delivers longer battery life with 19h 05m, while Samsung Galaxy M30s delivers 14h 29m, making Motorola One Macro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy M30s and Motorola One Macro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Motorola One Macro receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Samsung Galaxy M30s has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M30s
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Motorola One Macro
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
18 Sep, 2019
|
12 Oct, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.2 inches (15.75 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
10W Rapid Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(252,791 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(22,941 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
135,678
AnTuTu Score
|
159,825
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
19h 05m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 18, 2019
(Official)
|
Oct 12, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Android One
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
135,678
|
159,825
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.4 %
|
32.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.2 inches (15.75 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
420 nits
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
271 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.02 %
|
80.34 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91 %
|
82 %
|
Design
Height
|
159 mm
|
157.6 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
186 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
13 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.01/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
2 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.2 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 49 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 10W Rapid Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 29m
|
19h 05m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
4h 54m 37s
|
1h 48m 58s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.486 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|