Samsung Galaxy S II LTE
|
51%
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy S II LTE vs Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S II LTE vs Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 across performance, display, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy S II LTE runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy S II LTE the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy S II LTE offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers 4 inches, making Samsung Galaxy S II LTE the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy S II LTE features a Super AMOLED Plus display compared to Motorola ATRIX TV XT682's TFT, making Samsung Galaxy S II LTE the better display of the two.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy S II LTE offers a higher battery capacity with 1850 mAh, while Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers 1700 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy S II LTE better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy S II LTE offers higher internal storage with 16 GB, while Motorola ATRIX TV XT682 offers 1 GB, making Samsung Galaxy S II LTE the better option for storage.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy S II LTE
|
✕
Motorola ATRIX TV XT682
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
51%
|
Release Date
|
31 Dec, 2011
|
03 Jun, 2012
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Snapdragon S1
|
|
(upto 1.5 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1850 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
1 GB
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.5 GHz
|
1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 200
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
207 ppi
|
245 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
64.48 %
|
60.82 %
|
Design
Height
|
129.8 mm
|
119.8 mm
|
Width
|
68.8 mm
|
60.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.50 mm
|
9.9 mm
|
Weight
|
130.5 grams
|
129.7 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
N/A
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1850 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 6 Hours(3G) / Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
1 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Single SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Mini
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 800(band 20)
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Applications
|
Document editor (Word Excel PowerPoint PDF) Adobe Flash 10.1 support
|
Document Viewer
|