Samsung M300 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad

Comparing the Samsung M300 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Samsung M300 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad better for rear camera photography.

Samsung M300

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 May, 2007

07 Oct, 2010

Display

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	LCD
160.00x 160 pixels , 1.6 inches px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1000 mAh

Storage

600 KB

N/A

User Ratings

N/A	3.5/5 (17 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels 1.6 inches px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

21.93 %

Design

Height

80.00 mm

114 mm

Width

40.00 mm

60 mm

Thickness

16.70 mm

10.40 mm

Weight

63 grams

96 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

600 KB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes