Samsung Q200 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad

Comparing the Samsung Q200 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad across battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Battery: Samsung Q200 offers a higher battery capacity with 650 mAh, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making Samsung Q200 better for longer battery life.

Samsung Q200

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2002

07 Oct, 2010

Display

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
N/A	LCD
128x128 px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

N/A	2 MP Primary Camera

Battery

650 mAh

1000 mAh

User Ratings

N/A	3.5/5 (17 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

128x128 px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

21.93 %

Design

Height

85 mm

114 mm

Width

48 mm

60 mm

Thickness

20.00 mm

10.40 mm

Weight

90 grams

96 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

N/A	2 MP Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

N/A	Digital Zoom Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

650 mAh

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 7.5(2G)

Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

100 entries contact groups

Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Four way navigation keys Dynamic font size Softkeys Voice commands and dial Organizer Speed dial Menu shortcuts World clock 20 voice dial items Message templates

N/A