Samsung X650 vs Micromax X335

Comparing the Samsung X650 vs Micromax X335 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Samsung X650 and Micromax X335 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: Micromax X335 offers higher internal storage with 374 GB, while Samsung X650 offers 3 GB, making Micromax X335 the better option for storage.

Samsung X650

(Discontinued)

Micromax X335

₹2,899

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2006

22 May, 2012

Display

N/A	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)
N/A	TFT
160.00x 160 pixels , 8 lines px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

950 mAh

Storage

3 MB

374 KB

User Ratings

N/A	3.9/5 (43 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

TFT

Screen Size

N/A	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels 8 lines px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

143 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

40.98 %

Display Colour

N/A

65K

Design

Height

87.00 mm

104 mm

Width

44.00 mm

57 mm

Thickness

20.00 mm

13.10 mm

Weight

80 grams

69 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Image Resolution

N/A	640 x 480 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

N/A

950 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 6(2G)

Up to 4 Hours(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

3 MB

374 KB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

N/A	Yes Video Formats: 3GP MPEG4

Ring Tone

N/A	Music ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Yes Music Formats: MIDI MP3 WAV

Sensors

Games

N/A

Yes

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

N/A

Browser

Yes

Yes WAP

Phone Book

N/A	Yes Limited

SMS

N/A

Yes

MMS

N/A

Yes