Samsung X900 vs Micromax X600

Comparing the Samsung X900 vs Micromax X600 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax X600 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Samsung X900 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax X600 better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Micromax X600 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while Samsung X900 offers 128 GB, making Micromax X600 the better option for storage.

Samsung X900

(Discontinued)

Micromax X600

₹1,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2004

24 Jul, 2010

Display

N/A	3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
LCD	LCD
176x220 px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1000 mAh

Storage

128 MB

78 MB

User Ratings

N/A	3.7/5 (45 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	3.2 inches (8.13 cm)

Resolution

176x220 px

320x240 px

Pixel Density

N/A

125 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

50.15 %

Design

Height

89.7 mm

113 mm

Width

46.4 mm

56 mm

Thickness

24.00 mm

12.70 mm

Weight

116 grams

110 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

128 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AAC

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

Predictive Text Input Alarm Clock Calender Calculator Currency Converter To-do-list

N/A