|
62%
Seeken SG2
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Seeken SG2 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Seeken SG2 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while Seeken SG2 runs at 1.3 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Seeken SG2 offers 5.5 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Seeken SG2 and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Seeken SG2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 8 MP, making Seeken SG2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Seeken SG2 and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Seeken SG2 offers 3000 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Seeken SG2 offers 16 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
Seeken SG2
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
62%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
28 Dec, 2018
|
30 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
640x1280 px
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(4 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T720 MP2
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
640x1280 px
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
75.71 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
147.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
70 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
10 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
N/A
|