Sharp 911SH vs Micromax Q3 ezpad

Share  

Comparing the Sharp 911SH vs Micromax Q3 ezpad across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Sharp 911SH offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 1.3 MP, making Sharp 911SH better for rear camera photography.


Battery: Sharp 911SH offers a higher battery capacity with 1150 mAh, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making Sharp 911SH better for longer battery life.

...read more
Sharp 911SH
(Discontinued)
Micromax Q3 ezpad
(Discontinued)
Add to Compare

Summary

Release Date

03 Feb, 2006
15 Jun, 2009

Display

N/A
2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD
LCD
N/A
176x220 px

Rear Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera
1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Battery

1150 mAh
1000 mAh

Storage

N/A
10 MB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD
LCD

Screen Size

N/A
2.2 inches  (5.59 cm)

Resolution

N/A
176x220 px

Pixel Density

N/A
128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A
22.38 %

Design

Height

106 mm
111.2 mm

Width

50 mm
61.2 mm

Thickness

22.00 mm
13.00 mm

Weight

138 grams
97 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell
N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera
1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes
Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

1150 mAh
1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion
Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)
Up to 4(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A
10 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes
Yes Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM
Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported
5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No
No

Bluetooth

No
Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player
Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback Flight Mode

Sensors

Java

Yes
Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes
Yes

Phone Book

Yes
1000 entries Photocall

SMS

Yes
Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

Yes
Yes

Other Facilities

N/A
Voice memo T9