|
72%
Tecno Camon 15 Pro
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
₹8,490
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Camon 15 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Comparing the Tecno Camon 15 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,754, while Tecno Camon 15 Pro scores 1,057, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while Tecno Camon 15 Pro offers 6.53 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro the larger display of the two. Both Tecno Camon 15 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Tecno Camon 15 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Tecno Camon 15 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro offers 16 MP, making Tecno Camon 15 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 5020 mAh, while Tecno Camon 15 Pro offers 4000 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Tecno Camon 15 Pro offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro the better option for storage.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Tecno Camon 15 Pro has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Tecno Camon 15 Pro
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
₹8,490
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
25 Feb, 2020
|
17 Mar, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5020 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(504 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(162,019 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
118,467
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
14h 10m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 25, 2020
(Official)
|
Mar 17, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
8 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
118,467
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
33.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
30.7 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
450 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.32 %
|
84.62 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.2 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
163.3 mm
|
165.7 mm
|
Width
|
77.7 mm
|
76.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
203 grams
|
209 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.791/2.25" sensor size S5KGM2 CMOS image sensor ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @960 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Slow Motion
Macro Video Kaleidoscope Short Video Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
Primary Camera |
16 MP
Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
Pop-Up
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5020 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 29 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 10m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 37m 33s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.573 W/kg Body: 0.786 W/kg
|
Head: 0.898 W/kg Body: 0.483 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|