|
66%
Tecno Spark 5 Pro
₹8,899
(Discontinued)
|
75%
OPPO F11 Pro
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Spark 5 Pro vs OPPO F11 Pro
Comparing the Tecno Spark 5 Pro vs OPPO F11 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F11 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.1 GHz, while Tecno Spark 5 Pro runs at 1.8 GHz, making OPPO F11 Pro the better performer.
Display: Tecno Spark 5 Pro offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while OPPO F11 Pro offers 6.5 inches, making Tecno Spark 5 Pro the larger display of the two. OPPO F11 Pro features a TFT LTPS display compared to Tecno Spark 5 Pro's IPS LCD, making OPPO F11 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: OPPO F11 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Tecno Spark 5 Pro offers 16 MP, making OPPO F11 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: OPPO F11 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Tecno Spark 5 Pro offers 8 MP, making OPPO F11 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Tecno Spark 5 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while OPPO F11 Pro offers 4000 mAh, making Tecno Spark 5 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Tecno Spark 5 Pro and OPPO F11 Pro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: OPPO F11 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Tecno Spark 5 Pro has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Tecno Spark 5 Pro
₹8,899
(Discontinued)
|
✕
OPPO F11 Pro
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
13 Jul, 2020
|
15 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio A25
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT LTPS
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(1,822 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(138,384 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
149,995
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A25
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
149,995
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
23.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT LTPS
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
266 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.69 %
|
84.31 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.2 %
|
90.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.7 mm
|
161.3 mm
|
Width
|
76.3 mm
|
76.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
190 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
48 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.794.73 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera2.17 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.41 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 26.7 Hours(3G) / Up to 36 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 55m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 9m 53s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.323 W/kg Body: 0.922 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|