|
66%
Tecno Spark Go Plus
₹8,800
(Discontinued)
|
66%
Itel A100C
₹6,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Spark Go Plus vs Itel A100C
Comparing the Tecno Spark Go Plus vs Itel A100C across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Tecno Spark Go Plus runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Itel A100C runs at 1.8 GHz, making Tecno Spark Go Plus the better performer.
Display: Itel A100C offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while Tecno Spark Go Plus offers 6.52 inches, making Itel A100C the larger display of the two. Itel A100C features a IPS LCD display compared to Tecno Spark Go Plus's TFT, making Itel A100C the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Tecno Spark Go Plus and Itel A100C feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Tecno Spark Go Plus offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Itel A100C offers 5 MP, making Tecno Spark Go Plus better for front camera photography.
Battery: Itel A100C offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Tecno Spark Go Plus offers 4000 mAh, making Itel A100C better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100C offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Tecno Spark Go Plus offers 32 GB, making Itel A100C the better option for storage.
|
✕
Tecno Spark Go Plus
₹8,800
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Itel A100C
₹6,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
66%
|
Release Date
|
18 Jan, 2020
|
08 Jan, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(517 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
78,111
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
8h 09m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jan 08, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v15
|
Custom UI
|
Android Go
|
Android Go
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
28 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
78,111
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
267 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.22 %
|
N/A
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.5 %
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
166.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
75.8 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
8.5 mm
|
Weight
|
181 grams
|
N/A
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 Wide Angle 77° field-of-view |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
No
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
8h 09m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
4h 3m 35s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.787 W/kg Body: 0.863 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
DTS Sound
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|