|
72%
Tecno Spark Power
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Spark Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
Comparing the Tecno Spark Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,903, while Tecno Spark Power scores 843, making Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G offers a screen size of 6.74 inches, while Tecno Spark Power offers 6.35 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G the larger display of the two. Tecno Spark Power features a AMOLED display compared to Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G's IPS LCD, making Tecno Spark Power the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Tecno Spark Power offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Tecno Spark Power offers a higher front camera resolution with 13 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G offers 5 MP, making Tecno Spark Power better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G delivers longer battery life with 24h 50m, while Tecno Spark Power delivers 17h 00m, making Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Tecno Spark Power offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G offers 128 GB, making Tecno Spark Power the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G receives a higher expert rating of 7.5 from the editorial team, while Tecno Spark Power is rated 7.
User Rating: Tecno Spark Power receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Tecno Spark Power
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
26 Nov, 2019
|
16 Dec, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.35 inches (16.13 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1548 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
0.08 MP
Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
|
5 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(6,673 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(41,627 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
96,849
AnTuTu Score
|
375,663
AnTuTu Score
|
|
17h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
24h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Nov 26, 2019
(Official)
|
Dec 16, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v13
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
96,849
|
375,663
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
14.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
16.6 %
|
14.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.35 inches (16.13 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1548 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.16 %
|
83.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
158.5 mm
|
168 mm
|
Width
|
75.98 mm
|
78 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.17 mm
|
8.09 mm
|
Weight
|
198.2 grams
|
192 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.0 |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
0.08 MP
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Film Camera |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 00m
|
24h 50m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
4h 1m 21s
|
2h 33m 36s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|