UBEST D610 vs Micromax X275

Comparing the UBEST D610 vs Micromax X275 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both UBEST D610 and Micromax X275 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Micromax X275 offers a higher battery capacity with 2400 mAh, while UBEST D610 offers 1300 mAh, making Micromax X275 better for longer battery life.

UBEST D610

(Discontinued)

Micromax X275

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

11 Dec, 2010

01 Dec, 2011

User Ratings

N/A	2/5 (4 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2 inches (5.08 cm)

N/A

Resolution

N/A	240x320 px

Design

Height

112 mm

N/A

Width

46 mm

N/A

Thickness

16.00 mm

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

N/A	176x144 @ 10

Battery

Capacity

1300 mAh

2400 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

N/A	Up to 10(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: 3GP

N/A

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Hifi MP3 Player Super Bass Speaker High Quality Sound

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player

Sensors

Java

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 300

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Marathon Battery