Copy link to bookmark or share with others
VOTO V9 vs Nokia 2.2
Comparing the VOTO V9 vs Nokia 2.2 across performance, display, camera, battery and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Nokia 2.2 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while VOTO V9 runs at 1.5 GHz, making Nokia 2.2 the better performer.
Display: VOTO V9 offers a screen size of 5.85 inches, while Nokia 2.2 offers 5.71 inches, making VOTO V9 the larger display of the two. Both VOTO V9 and Nokia 2.2 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both VOTO V9 and Nokia 2.2 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: VOTO V9 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Nokia 2.2 offers 5 MP, making VOTO V9 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both VOTO V9 and Nokia 2.2 offer the same 3000 mAh battery capacity.
User Rating: Nokia 2.2 receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while VOTO V9 has a rating of 3.7.
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
09 Apr, 2019
|
10 Jun, 2019
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6739
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.5 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.85 inches (14.86 cm)
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1512 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
N/A
|
16 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(1,118 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(4,883 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
65,184
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jun 10, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Android One
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6739
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8100
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR3
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
65,184
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
24.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.85 inches (14.86 cm)
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1512 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
286 ppi
|
295 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
78.73 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
145.9 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
70.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9.3 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
153 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
|
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 55m 45s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
N/A
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes
|
Yes Up to 400 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
No
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
N/A
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|