vivo T4 vs Nothing Phone 3a Lite

Comparing the vivo T4 vs Nothing Phone 3a Lite across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: vivo T4 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 3,334, while Nothing Phone 3a Lite scores 2,967, making vivo T4 the better performer.

Display: Both vivo T4 and Nothing Phone 3a Lite offer the same screen size of 6.77 inches and feature the same AMOLED display.

Rear Camera: Both vivo T4 and Nothing Phone 3a Lite feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.

Front Camera: vivo T4 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Nothing Phone 3a Lite offers 16 MP, making vivo T4 better for front camera photography.

Battery: vivo T4 delivers longer battery life with 18h 01m, while Nothing Phone 3a Lite delivers 13h 06m, making vivo T4 the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: Both vivo T4 and Nothing Phone 3a Lite offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.

Expert Review: vivo T4 receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while Nothing Phone 3a Lite is rated 7.9.

User Rating: vivo T4 and Nothing Phone 3a Lite both receive the same user rating of 4.4.

vivo T4

₹24,999

@ Flipkart

Nothing Phone 3a Lite

₹27,499

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

85%

82%

Release Date

29 Apr, 2025

15 Dec, 2025

Performance


Snapdragon 7s Gen 3	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
8 GB RAM	8 GB RAM

Display


6.77 inches (17.2 cm)	6.77 inches (17.2 cm)
AMOLED	AMOLED
1080x2392 px (FHD+)	1080x2392 px (FHD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera	50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera
2 MP Depth Camera	8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
N/A	2 MP Macro Camera

Front Camera


32 MP Wide Angle Lens	16 MP Wide Angle Lens

Battery


7300 mAh	5000 mAh
90W Flash Charging	33W Fast Charging
No Wireless Charging	No Wireless Charging

Storage

128 GB	128 GB
UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2

Expert Review

8.2/10

Read Expert Review

7.9/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Sleek & durable design
Capable performance
Massive battery
Speedy charging

Bright & vibrant display
Head turning design
Dependable battery life
Stand out, long-supported software

Cons

No ultrawide lens
Lacks NFC support

Average speaker
Charges slow
Cameras need improvement

User Ratings

4.4/5

(82,040 ratings)

4.4/5

(149 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

797,572 AnTuTu Score	907,685 AnTuTu Score
18h 01m Battery Life (PC Mark)	13h 06m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹24,999

@ Flipkart

₹27,499

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

Video

2 More Videos

1 More Video

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Apr 29, 2025

(Official)

Nov 27, 2025

(Official)

Operating System

Android v15

OS Updates

2 Years

3 Years

Security Updates

3 Years

6 Years

Custom UI

Funtouch OS

Nothing OS

Performance

Performance Rating

Very Good

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro

Processor

Octa core

2.5 GHz, Single core, Cortex A720 2.4 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520

Octa core

2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Adreno 810

Mali-G615 MC2

RAM

8 GB / 12 GB

8 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

797,572

907,685

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

23.0 s

18.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

N/A

850

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

3.0 %

7.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

41.2 %

12.9 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Display Type

AMOLED (Curved Display)

AMOLED

Screen Size

6.77 inches (17.2 cm)

Resolution

1080x2392 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

5000 nits

3000 nits

HBM Brightness

1300 nits

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

Pixel Density

388 ppi

387 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

88.64 %

86.5 %

Screen Protection

N/A

Yes

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

N/A

Yes

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

N/A

86.7 %

Design

Height

163.4 mm

164 mm

Width

76.4 mm

78 mm

Thickness

7.89 mm

8.3 mm

Weight

199 grams

Build Material

Back: Plastic

Back: Panda Glass

Water Resistance

Yes Splash proof IP65

Yes Water resistant IP54

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size IMX882 CMOS image sensor Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size

50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.9 Wide Angle24 mm focal length 1/1.57" sensor size 1µm pixel size

2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera15 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size

N/A	2 MP f/2.4 Macro Camera

Autofocus

Yes	Yes Phase Detection Autofocus

OIS

Yes

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

8150 x 6150 Pixels

6150 x 8150 Pixels

Settings

ISO control

N/A

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
SuperMoon

High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Macro Mode

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Touch to focus

10 x Digital Zoom

Video Recording

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60/120 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Excellent

Very Good

Resolution

32 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera

16 MP
f/2.5 Wide Angle Primary Camera24 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size

Autofocus

N/A

Flash

N/A

Video Recording

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps

Full HD @30/60 fps

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Excellent

Very Good

Capacity

7300 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

N/A

Quick Charging

Yes 90W Flash Charging 50% in 33 minutes

Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 20 minutes

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

18h 01m

13h 06m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

0h 45m 0s

0h 58m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

128 GB / 256 GB

Storage Type

UFS 2.2

Expandable Storage

No	Yes Up to 2048 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N20 / N28 / N66
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N71 / N77 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 3500(band 48) / 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 600(band 71) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) / 700 (band 12)

SIM 2

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N20 / N28 / N66
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N71 / N77 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 12) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 600(Band 71) / 850(band 26) / 1700(band 66) / 700 (band 12)