|
93%
vivo X200T
₹59,999
@Flipkart
|
94%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
₹94,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo X200T vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Comparing the vivo X200T vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 10,491, while vivo X200T scores 8,463, making Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while vivo X200T offers 6.67 inches, making Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus features a Dynamic AMOLED 2x display compared to vivo X200T's AMOLED, making Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo X200T and Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo X200T offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus offers 12 MP, making vivo X200T better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus delivers longer battery life with 16h 46m, while vivo X200T delivers 16h 14m, making Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo X200T and Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus offer the same internal storage of 256 GB.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus receives a higher expert rating of 8.5 from the editorial team, while vivo X200T is rated 8.4.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus receives a higher user rating of 4.8, while vivo X200T has a rating of 4.6.
|
vivo X200T
₹59,999
@ Flipkart
|
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
₹94,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
93%
|
94%
|
Release Date
|
03 Feb, 2026
|
11 Mar, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
|
Samsung Exynos 2600
|
|
Octa Core (upto 3.73 GHz)
|
Deca Core (upto 3.8 GHz)
|
|
12 GB RAM
|
12 GB RAM
|
| Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Dynamic AMOLED 2x
|
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1440x3120 px (QHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
12 MP
Telephoto Ultra-Wide Angle Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
|
50 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
10 MP
Telephoto Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Lens
|
12 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6200 mAh
|
4900 mAh
|
|
90W Flash Charging
|
45W
|
|
Wireless Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.4/10
|
8.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.6/5
(9,915 ratings)
|
4.8/5
(208 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
2,821,319
AnTuTu Score
|
3,106,879
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 14m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 46m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹59,999
@ Flipkart
|
Not Available in any store
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 27, 2026
(Official)
|
Feb 25, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
5 Years
|
7 Year
|
Security Updates
|
7 Years
|
7 Year
|
Custom UI
|
Origin OS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus MT6691
View Details
|
Samsung Exynos 2600
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
3.73 GHz, Single core, Cortex X925 3.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex X4 2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720 |
Deca Core
3.8 GHz, Single core, Arm C1-Ultra 3.25 GHz, Tri core, ARM C1-Pro 2.75 GHz, Hexa Core, ARM C1-Pro |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
3 nm
|
2 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Immortalis-G925 MC12
|
Xclipse 960
|
RAM
|
12 GB
|
12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
LPDDR5X
|
Cooling Technology
|
Vapor Chamber
|
Vapor Chamber
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
2,821,319
|
3,106,879
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 s
|
10.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
6,124
|
6,210
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
26.5 %
|
24.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Dynamic AMOLED 2x
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1440x3120 px (QHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
5000 nits
|
2600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
1600 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
460 ppi
|
513 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
90.35 %
|
91.58 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass Armor 2
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
94.30 %
|
91.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
160 mm
|
158.4 mm
|
Width
|
74.3 mm
|
75.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.99 mm
|
7.3 mm
|
Weight
|
203 grams
|
190 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Aluminium Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1 meter)
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.57 Wide Angle23 mm focal length 1/1.56" sensor size IMX921 1µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera3x Optical Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle24 mm focal length 1/1.56" sensor size |
|
50 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera15 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
12 MP
f/2.2 Telephoto Ultra-Wide Angle Camera67 mm focal length 1/3.94" sensor size 1.0µm pixel size |
|
50 MP
f/2.57 Telephoto Camera70 mm focal length 1/1.95" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
10 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/2.55" sensor size 1.4µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Dual Pixel Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
6144 x 8192 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Optical Zoom |
3 x Optical Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30/60/120/240 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
Video Pro Mode |
Video HDR
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Primary Camera20 mm focal length 1/3.44" sensor size |
12 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3.2" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual Pixel Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6200 mAh
|
4900 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Silicon Carbon
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 90W Flash Charging
|
Yes 45W 69% in 30 minutes
|
Wireless Charging
|
Yes 40W Wireless Charging
|
Yes 25W Wireless Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Wireless Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 4.5W Wireless Reverse Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 14m
|
16h 46m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
44m
|
1h 1m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 GB / 512 GB
|
256 GB / 512 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n/ac/be/ax) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 be) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v6.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
IR Blaster
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Ultrasonic
|
Ultrasonic
|
Compare Prices
|
₹59,999
@ Flipkart
|
Not Available in any store
|
Related Comparisons
vivo X200T
vivo V80 5G
vivo X200T
Motorola Signature
vivo X200T
vivo X300
vivo X200T
Samsung Galaxy S25
vivo X200T
vivo V70
vivo X200T
OnePlus 15R
vivo X200T
vivo X200
vivo X200T
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
vivo X200T
vivo V70 Elite
vivo X200T
Xiaomi 17T
vivo X200T
iQOO 15R
vivo X200T
vivo X300 FE
vivo X200T
vivo X200 FE
vivo X200T
OPPO Reno15 Pro Mini
vivo X200T
OnePlus 13s
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S26
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Apple iPhone 17
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Google Pixel 11
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Google Pixel 11 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus 5G
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
OnePlus 15
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
vivo X300 FE