XOLO Q800
₹9,556
(Out of Stock)
|
48%
Archos 35 Carbon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q800 vs Archos 35 Carbon
Comparing the XOLO Q800 vs Archos 35 Carbon across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q800 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Archos 35 Carbon runs at 1.0 GHz, making XOLO Q800 the better performer.
Display: XOLO Q800 offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Archos 35 Carbon offers 3.5 inches, making XOLO Q800 the larger display of the two. Both XOLO Q800 and Archos 35 Carbon feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: XOLO Q800 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Archos 35 Carbon offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Q800 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: XOLO Q800 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1 MP, while Archos 35 Carbon offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Q800 better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO Q800 offers a higher battery capacity with 2100 mAh, while Archos 35 Carbon offers 1300 mAh, making XOLO Q800 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both XOLO Q800 and Archos 35 Carbon offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
XOLO Q800
₹9,556
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Archos 35 Carbon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
48%
|
Release Date
|
08 Mar, 2013
|
03 May, 2013
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6589M
|
Snapdragon S1
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
540x960 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
1 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2100 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(1,654 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 08, 2013
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6589M
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
61.45 %
|
50.04 %
|
Design
Height
|
135.5 mm
|
117 mm
|
Width
|
67 mm
|
62.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.6 mm
|
10.2 mm
|
Weight
|
143.5 grams
|
105 grams
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
640 x 480 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
1 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2100 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 10(3G) / Up to 16(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
SIM1: Mini
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|