|
53%
XOLO A500S Lite
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
52%
Adcom A35
₹1,490
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO A500S Lite vs Adcom A35
Comparing the XOLO A500S Lite vs Adcom A35 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO A500S Lite runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Adcom A35 runs at 1.2 GHz, making XOLO A500S Lite the better performer.
Display: XOLO A500S Lite offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Adcom A35 offers 3.5 inches, making XOLO A500S Lite the larger display of the two. XOLO A500S Lite features a IPS LCD display compared to Adcom A35's LCD, making XOLO A500S Lite the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: XOLO A500S Lite offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3 MP, while Adcom A35 offers 2 MP, making XOLO A500S Lite better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Adcom A35 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while XOLO A500S Lite offers 0.3 MP, making Adcom A35 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both XOLO A500S Lite and Adcom A35 offer the same 1400 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Adcom A35 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while XOLO A500S Lite offers 4 GB, making Adcom A35 the better option for storage.
User Rating: XOLO A500S Lite receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while Adcom A35 has a rating of 2.7.
|
✕
XOLO A500S Lite
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Adcom A35
₹1,490
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
30 May, 2014
|
30 Sep, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
3 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(1,020 ratings)
|
2.7/5
(32 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 30, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.87 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
127 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
63 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.2 mm
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2000 x 1504 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Burst mode
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(3G) / Up to 16 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|