XOLO Q600S
₹7,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Iris Fuel 50
₹7,800
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q600S vs Lava Iris Fuel 50
Comparing the XOLO Q600S vs Lava Iris Fuel 50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris Fuel 50 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while XOLO Q600S runs at 1.2 GHz, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while XOLO Q600S offers 4.5 inches, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 the larger display of the two. Both XOLO Q600S and Lava Iris Fuel 50 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while XOLO Q600S offers 5 MP, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while XOLO Q600S offers 0.3 MP, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers a higher battery capacity with 3000 mAh, while XOLO Q600S offers 2000 mAh, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while XOLO Q600S offers 4 GB, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 the better option for storage.
User Rating: XOLO Q600S and Lava Iris Fuel 50 both receive the same user rating of 3.8.
|
✕
XOLO Q600S
₹7,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Lava Iris Fuel 50
₹7,800
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
29 May, 2014
|
06 Nov, 2014
|
Performance
|
Broadcom BCM23550
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
540x960 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
2000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(225 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(662 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 29, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
Broadcom BCM23550
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Broadcom VideoCore IV
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
60.1 %
|
65.14 %
|
Design
Height
|
136.5 mm
|
144.8 mm
|
Width
|
68 mm
|
72.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
9.5 mm
|
Weight
|
115 grams
|
160 grams
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 11 Hours(3G) / Up to 24 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 13 Hours(3G) / Up to 17 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|