XOLO Q900T
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
50%
Lava 3G 354
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q900T vs Lava 3G 354
Comparing the XOLO Q900T vs Lava 3G 354 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q900T runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while Lava 3G 354 runs at 1.0 GHz, making XOLO Q900T the better performer.
Display: XOLO Q900T offers a screen size of 4.7 inches, while Lava 3G 354 offers 3.5 inches, making XOLO Q900T the larger display of the two. XOLO Q900T features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava 3G 354's LCD, making XOLO Q900T the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: XOLO Q900T offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava 3G 354 offers 2 MP, making XOLO Q900T better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: XOLO Q900T offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Lava 3G 354 offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Q900T better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO Q900T offers a higher battery capacity with 1800 mAh, while Lava 3G 354 offers 1400 mAh, making XOLO Q900T better for longer battery life.
Storage: XOLO Q900T offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Lava 3G 354 offers 2 GB, making XOLO Q900T the better option for storage.
User Rating: XOLO Q900T receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Lava 3G 354 has a rating of 3.4.
|
✕
XOLO Q900T
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Lava 3G 354
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
50%
|
Release Date
|
10 May, 2014
|
10 May, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6589T
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.5 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1800 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
2 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(78 ratings)
|
3.4/5
(12 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 10, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6589T
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
312 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
67.28 %
|
50.68 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
133.8 mm
|
118 mm
|
Width
|
67.6 mm
|
61 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.25 mm
|
11.8 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
103.8 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 fps
|
640x480 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 10 Hours(3G) / Up to 15 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
2 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Body: 1.6 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|