|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
₹11,998
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
realme Narzo N65 5G
₹9,980
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G vs realme Narzo N65 5G
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G vs realme Narzo N65 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,984, while realme Narzo N65 5G scores 1,941, making Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G offers a screen size of 6.79 inches, while realme Narzo N65 5G offers 6.67 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G and realme Narzo N65 5G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G and realme Narzo N65 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G and realme Narzo N65 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G delivers longer battery life with 18h 06m, while realme Narzo N65 5G delivers 17h 16m, making Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G and realme Narzo N65 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while realme Narzo N65 5G is rated 7.8.
User Rating: realme Narzo N65 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
₹11,998
(Out of Stock)
|
realme Narzo N65 5G
₹9,980
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
04 Aug, 2023
|
31 May, 2024
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.79 inches (17.25 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
720x1604 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
15W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.8/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(43,538 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(2,407 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
18h 06m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 16m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
420,659
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 04, 2023
(Official)
|
May 31, 2024
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v13
|
Android v14
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
HyperOS
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 613
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
420,659
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
18.8 %
|
15.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.79 inches (17.25 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
720x1604 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
550 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
625 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
625 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
396 ppi
|
264 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.26 %
|
85.23 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91 %
|
89.97 %
|
Design
Height
|
168.6 mm
|
165.6 mm
|
Width
|
76.28 mm
|
76.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.17 mm
|
7.89 mm
|
Weight
|
199 grams
|
190 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view26 mm focal length S5KJN1 ISO-CELL |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 15W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 06m
|
17h 16m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 44m 31s
|
2h 29m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.070 W/kg Body: 0.723 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.3
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|