|
66%
Xiaomi Redmi 9i
₹12,990
@Amazon
|
74%
boltt Evo 4G
₹9,999
@Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi 9i vs boltt Evo 4G
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi 9i vs boltt Evo 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi 9i runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while boltt Evo 4G runs at 1.8 GHz, making Xiaomi Redmi 9i the better performer.
Display: boltt Evo 4G offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi 9i offers 6.53 inches, making boltt Evo 4G the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi 9i features a IPS LCD display compared to boltt Evo 4G's LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi 9i the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: boltt Evo 4G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi 9i offers 13 MP, making boltt Evo 4G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: boltt Evo 4G offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi 9i offers 5 MP, making boltt Evo 4G better for front camera photography.
Battery: boltt Evo 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Xiaomi Redmi 9i offers 5000 mAh, making boltt Evo 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi 9i and boltt Evo 4G offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 9i
₹12,990
@ Amazon
|
✕
boltt Evo 4G
₹9,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
15 Sep, 2020
|
27 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G25
|
Unisoc T7250
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
| Helio G25 vs Unisoc T7250 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1570 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
45W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(587,088 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
495,830
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 42m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,990
@ Amazon
|
₹9,999
@ Flipkart
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Aug 25, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
1 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Year
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G25
View Details
|
Unisoc T7250
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
495,830
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
160
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1570 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
270 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
900 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
240 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.6:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
254 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.01 %
|
86.97 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.9 mm
|
166.48 mm
|
Width
|
77.07 mm
|
78.23 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
8.78 mm
|
Weight
|
194 grams
|
219 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes IP6X IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof Shock proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30/120 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Slow Motion
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 45W Fast Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 42m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 13m 20s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.528 W/kg Body: 0.791 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm, USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Capacitive
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,990
@ Amazon
|
₹9,999
@ Flipkart
|