|
67%
Xiaomi Redmi A1
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Itel A49
₹6,500
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi A1 vs Itel A49
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi A1 vs Itel A49 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi A1 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Itel A49 runs at 1.4 GHz, making Xiaomi Redmi A1 the better performer.
Display: Itel A49 offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi A1 offers 6.52 inches, making Itel A49 the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Itel A49 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi A1 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Itel A49 offers 5 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi A1 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Itel A49 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi A1 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Itel A49 offers 4000 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi A1 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Itel A49 offer the same internal storage of 32 GB.
User Rating: Itel A49 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Xiaomi Redmi A1 has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi A1
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Itel A49
₹6,500
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
67%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
09 Sep, 2022
|
15 Mar, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc SC9832E
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.4 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera
|
0.3 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(21,823 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(1,114 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
89,878
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
13h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 09, 2022
(Official)
|
Mar 15, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
Android Go
|
Android Go
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc SC9832E
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 1.4 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
N/A
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
28 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
Mali-T820 MP1
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
89,878
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
33.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
15.6 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
400 nits
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
120 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
266 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.15 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
88.89 %
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.9 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
76.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera |
0.3 MP
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 31.5 Hours(4G)
|
Up to 28 Hours(4G) / Up to 28.8 Hours(3G) / Up to 52 Hours(2G)
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 29m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 39m 50s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|