|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Tecno Pova 3 128GB
₹12,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G vs Tecno Pova 3 128GB
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G vs Tecno Pova 3 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,639, while Tecno Pova 3 128GB scores 1,295, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the better performer.
Display: Tecno Pova 3 128GB offers a screen size of 6.9 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers 6.43 inches, making Tecno Pova 3 128GB the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G features a AMOLED display compared to Tecno Pova 3 128GB's IPS LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G and Tecno Pova 3 128GB feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers a higher front camera resolution with 13 MP, while Tecno Pova 3 128GB offers 8 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G delivers longer battery life with 16h 43m, while Tecno Pova 3 128GB delivers 14h 44m, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Tecno Pova 3 128GB offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the better option for storage.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G and Tecno Pova 3 128GB both receive the same user rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Tecno Pova 3 128GB
₹12,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
11 Feb, 2022
|
27 Jun, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G88
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
33W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(71,050 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(3,379 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
269,010
AnTuTu Score
|
254,342
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 43m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 11, 2022
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
HiOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G88
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
269,010
|
254,342
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
13.8 %
|
26.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
389 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.64 %
|
83.43 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
159.8 mm
|
173.1 mm
|
Width
|
73.8 mm
|
78.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
179 grams
|
230 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 Wide Angle |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
2560x1440 @ 30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Movie Frame
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 60 minutes
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging 50% in 40 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 43m
|
14h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 9m 1s
|
1h 57m 41s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|