|
70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
Vernee Apollo
₹21,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB vs Vernee Apollo
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB vs Vernee Apollo across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Vernee Apollo runs at a higher processing speed of 2.5 GHz, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB runs at 1.8 GHz, making Vernee Apollo the better performer.
Display: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB and Vernee Apollo offer the same screen size of 5.5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Vernee Apollo offers a higher rear camera resolution with 21 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers 16 MP, making Vernee Apollo better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Vernee Apollo offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers 5 MP, making Vernee Apollo better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers a higher battery capacity with 4050 mAh, while Vernee Apollo offers 3180 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB better for longer battery life.
Storage: Vernee Apollo offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers 32 GB, making Vernee Apollo the better option for storage.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Vernee Apollo
₹21,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
70%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
09 Mar, 2016
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 650
|
MediaTek MT6797
|
|
Hexa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Deca Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
1440x2560 px (QHD (2k))
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
21 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4050 mAh
|
3180 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 4.5
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(198,832 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 09, 2016
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v6.0 (Marshmallow)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
|
MediaTek MT6797
|
Processor
|
Hexa Core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A72 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Deca Core
2.5 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A72 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
28 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 510
|
Mali-T880 MP4
|
RAM
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR3
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
1440x2560 px (QHD (2k))
|
Aspect Ratio
|
16:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
401 ppi
|
534 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
72.98 %
|
72.4 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
150 mm
|
152 mm
|
Width
|
76 mm
|
75.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
9.3 mm
|
Weight
|
164 grams
|
188 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Aluminium
|
Frame: Metal
Back: Metal |
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0CMOS image sensor |
21 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2IMX230 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
N/A
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
5288 x 3968 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Digital image stabilization Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Digital image stabilization Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @120 fps |
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.0 Primary CameraPureCel |
8 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4050 mAh
|
3180 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes Quick Charging
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 4.5
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano (Hybrid) SIM2: Micro
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8)
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.256 W/kg Body: 1.102 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.1
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Back
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|