|
66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note
₹10,833
(Discontinued)
|
Mito Fantasy U A60
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Mito Fantasy U A60
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Mito Fantasy U A60 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note runs at a higher processing speed of 1.7 GHz, while Mito Fantasy U A60 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Xiaomi Redmi Note the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note offers a screen size of 5.5 inches, while Mito Fantasy U A60 offers 5 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Mito Fantasy U A60 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Mito Fantasy U A60 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Mito Fantasy U A60 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note offers a higher battery capacity with 3100 mAh, while Mito Fantasy U A60 offers 2000 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi Note better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Mito Fantasy U A60 offer the same internal storage of 8 GB.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note
₹10,833
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Mito Fantasy U A60
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Snapdragon
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.7 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
3100 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(10,298 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.7 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-450
|
Adreno 305
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.65 %
|
66.06 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Design
Height
|
154 mm
|
144.8 mm
|
Width
|
78.7 mm
|
72 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
199 grams
|
140 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.228 mm focal length |
13 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4160 x 3120 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
1920x1080 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
3100 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.875 W/kg Body: 0.579 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|