|
54%
ZTE Grand X2
₹4,990
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Grand X2 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the ZTE Grand X2 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: ZTE Grand X2 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making ZTE Grand X2 the better performer.
Display: ZTE Grand X2 offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making ZTE Grand X2 the larger display of the two. ZTE Grand X2 features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making ZTE Grand X2 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: ZTE Grand X2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making ZTE Grand X2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: ZTE Grand X2 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making ZTE Grand X2 better for front camera photography.
Battery: ZTE Grand X2 offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making ZTE Grand X2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: ZTE Grand X2 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 GB, making ZTE Grand X2 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while ZTE Grand X2 has a rating of 3.6.
|
✕
ZTE Grand X2
₹4,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
30 Sep, 2013
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
Intel Atom
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
1 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(25 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
Intel Atom Z2580
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
1 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
326 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
10.3 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus Face detection |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
N/A
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|