|
54%
Zears Andro Z5
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Zears Andro Z5 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Zears Andro Z5 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Zears Andro Z5 and Lava Iris 406q run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: Zears Andro Z5 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Zears Andro Z5 the larger display of the two. Zears Andro Z5 features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Zears Andro Z5 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making Zears Andro Z5 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making Zears Andro Z5 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher battery capacity with 2350 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making Zears Andro Z5 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Zears Andro Z5 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Zears Andro Z5
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
25 Jan, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2350 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
187 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.66 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
146.2 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
77.6 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.4 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2350 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|