Zen Ultrafone 102 vs iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super

Comparing the Zen Ultrafone 102 vs iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Zen Ultrafone 102 and iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super offer the same screen size of 3.5 inches, but iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super features a LCD display compared to Zen Ultrafone 102's TFT, making iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both Zen Ultrafone 102 and iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Zen Ultrafone 102 offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super offers 1250 mAh, making Zen Ultrafone 102 better for longer battery life.

Zen Ultrafone 102

(Discontinued)

iBall Andi 3.5KKe Super

₹2,539

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	03 Feb, 2014

User Feedback

General

Operating System

Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)

Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)

Performance

Processor

N/A	1.3 GHz, Cortex A7

RAM

N/A

256 MB

Display

Display Type

TFT

LCD

Screen Size

3.5 inches (8.89 cm)

Resolution

320x480 px

Pixel Density

165 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

45.01 %

N/A

Design

Height

124.1 mm

N/A

Width

65.3 mm

N/A

Thickness

10.8 mm

N/A

Weight

95 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A	Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

1600 x 1200 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Front Camera

Resolution

N/A	0.3 MP Primary Camera

Battery

Capacity

1500 mAh

1250 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4 Hours(2G)

N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

512 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes

GPS

N/A	Yes with A-GPS

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm

N/A

Sensors

Other Sensors

Accelerometer