Zen Ultrafone 402 Style
₹2,351
(Discontinued)
|
54%
Celkon Campus Q405
₹2,565
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Zen Ultrafone 402 Style vs Celkon Campus Q405
Comparing the Zen Ultrafone 402 Style vs Celkon Campus Q405 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Zen Ultrafone 402 Style runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Celkon Campus Q405 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Zen Ultrafone 402 Style the better performer.
Display: Both Zen Ultrafone 402 Style and Celkon Campus Q405 offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Zen Ultrafone 402 Style features a LCD display compared to Celkon Campus Q405's TFT, making Zen Ultrafone 402 Style the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Zen Ultrafone 402 Style offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Celkon Campus Q405 offers 3.2 MP, making Zen Ultrafone 402 Style better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Zen Ultrafone 402 Style and Celkon Campus Q405 feature a 1.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Zen Ultrafone 402 Style offers a higher battery capacity with 1600 mAh, while Celkon Campus Q405 offers 1500 mAh, making Zen Ultrafone 402 Style better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Zen Ultrafone 402 Style and Celkon Campus Q405 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Celkon Campus Q405 receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while Zen Ultrafone 402 Style has a rating of 3.3.
|
Zen Ultrafone 402 Style
₹2,351
(Discontinued)
|
Celkon Campus Q405
₹2,565
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
07 Mar, 2015
|
22 May, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
1.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1600 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.3/5
(26 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(479 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
57.15 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
64.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9.9 mm
|
Weight
|
130 grams
|
137 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1600 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|