Google Pixel 10A vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G

Comparing the Google Pixel 10A vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and expert reviews to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Google Pixel 10A runs at a higher processing speed of 3.1 GHz, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G runs at 2.4 GHz, making Google Pixel 10A the better performer.

Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G offers a screen size of 6.83 inches, while Google Pixel 10A offers 6.3 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G features a AMOLED display compared to Google Pixel 10A's P-OLED, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Google Pixel 10A offers 48 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G better for rear camera photography.

Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Google Pixel 10A offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G better for front camera photography.

Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G delivers longer battery life with 21h 55m, while Google Pixel 10A delivers 13h 54m, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: Google Pixel 10A offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G offers 128 GB, making Google Pixel 10A the better option for storage.

Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Google Pixel 10A is rated 7.9.

Google Pixel 10A

₹51,685

@ Amazon

Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G

₹36,999

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

86%

81%

Release Date

06 Mar, 2026

17 Sep, 2026

Performance


Google Tensor G4	Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
Octa Core (upto 3.1 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
8 GB RAM	8 GB RAM
Google Tensor G4 vs Snapdragon 6s Gen 4

Display


6.3 inches (16 cm)	6.83 inches (17.35 cm)
P-OLED	AMOLED
1080x2424 px (FHD+)	1280x2772 px (FHD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


48 MP Primary Camera	50 MP Primary Camera
13 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera	8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Front Camera


13 MP	16 MP

Battery


5100 mAh	9000 mAh
45W Fast Charging	67W Fast Charging
Wireless Charging	N/A

Storage

256 GB	128 GB
UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2

Expert Review

7.9/10

Read Expert Review

8.0/10

Pros

Compact design, improved durability
Decent battery life
7 years of software updates

Excellent battery life
Sharp and vibrant AMOLED display
Impressive software support
Solid build quality

Cons

Same Tensor G4 chip as Pixel 9a
Limited AI features
Slow charging speed

Performance could have been better
Average secondary camera

User Ratings

4.5/5

(3,258 ratings)

N/A

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

1,400,792 AnTuTu Score	949,300 AnTuTu Score
13h 54m Battery Life (PC Mark)	21h 55m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹51,685

@ Amazon

₹36,999

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Feb 18, 2026

(Official)

Sep 15, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Android v16

OS Updates

7 Year

4 Year

Security Updates

7 Year

6 Year

Custom UI

N/A

HyperOS

Performance

Performance Rating

Very Good

Chipset

Google Tensor G4

View Details

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4

View Details

Processor

Octa core

3.1 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.92 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520

Octa core

2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Mali-G715 MP7

Adreno

RAM

8 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X

LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

1,400,792

949,300

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

8.0 s

24.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

N/A

772

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

9.0 %

N/A

Heating* (The lower, the better)

32.8 %

N/A

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Display Type

P-OLED

AMOLED

Screen Size

6.3 inches (16 cm)

6.83 inches (17.35 cm)

Resolution

1080x2424 px (FHD+)

1280x2772 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

3000 nits

3500 nits

HBM Brightness

1800 nits

N/A

PWM Dimming

N/A

3840 Hz

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

Touch Sampling Rate

N/A

240 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

Pixel Density

422 ppi

447 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

85.29 %

89.32 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla Glass 7i

Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

Yes

N/A

Design

Height

153.9 mm

163.45 mm

Width

73 mm

78.27 mm

Thickness

9 mm

8.46 mm

Weight

183 grams

226 grams

Build Material

Back: Plastic

N/A

Water Resistance

Yes Water resistant IP68

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69K IP69 IP67 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

48 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoomf/1.725 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8

13 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera22 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Autofocus

N/A

Yes

Flash

Yes Dual LED Flash

Yes LED Flash

Camera Features

5 x Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Optical Zoom

Video Recording

4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps

Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Excellent

Very Good

Resolution

13 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera

16 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera

Flash

Yes	Yes Screen flash

Video Recording

4k @30 fps

Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Capacity

5100 mAh

9000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-Polymer

Silicon Carbon

Quick Charging

Yes 45W Fast Charging

Yes 67W Fast Charging 100% in 47 minutes

Wireless Charging

Yes

N/A

Reverse Charging

N/A	Yes 22.5W Reverse Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

13h 54m

21h 55m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

1h 26m

1h 36m 36s

Storage

Internal Storage

256 GB

128 GB

Storage Type

UFS 3.1

UFS 2.2

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: eSIM

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N18 / N19 / N20 / N26 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78 / N79

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 7009(band 12) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1500(band 21) / 850(band 26)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 3500(band 48) / 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19)

SIM 2

N/A	5G Bands: FDD N1 / N5 / N8 / N28 TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78

N/A	4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3500(band 48) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19)