iBall Andi 3.5KKe
₹7,795
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 3.5KKe vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the iBall Andi 3.5KKe vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while iBall Andi 3.5KKe runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris 406q offers a screen size of 4 inches, while iBall Andi 3.5KKe offers 3.5 inches, making Lava Iris 406q the larger display of the two. iBall Andi 3.5KKe features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making iBall Andi 3.5KKe the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while iBall Andi 3.5KKe offers 3.2 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both iBall Andi 3.5KKe and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while iBall Andi 3.5KKe offers 1450 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 406q offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while iBall Andi 3.5KKe offers 2 GB, making Lava Iris 406q the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while iBall Andi 3.5KKe has a rating of 3.1.
|
✕
iBall Andi 3.5KKe
₹7,795
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
03 Jul, 2013
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
1450 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
2 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.1/5
(79 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
1 GHz, Cortex A9
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
165 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
51.34 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
115.45 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
61.54 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.55 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
110 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
1450 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
2 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|