iBall Andi 4.5Q
|
54%
Zears Andro Z5
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 4.5Q vs Zears Andro Z5
Comparing the iBall Andi 4.5Q vs Zears Andro Z5 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Zears Andro Z5 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while iBall Andi 4.5Q runs at 1.0 GHz, making Zears Andro Z5 the better performer.
Display: Zears Andro Z5 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while iBall Andi 4.5Q offers 4.5 inches, making Zears Andro Z5 the larger display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both iBall Andi 4.5Q and Zears Andro Z5 feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while iBall Andi 4.5Q offers 0.3 MP, making Zears Andro Z5 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher battery capacity with 2350 mAh, while iBall Andi 4.5Q offers 2050 mAh, making Zears Andro Z5 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both iBall Andi 4.5Q and Zears Andro Z5 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
iBall Andi 4.5Q
|
✕
Zears Andro Z5
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
25 Jan, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
N/A
|
LCD
|
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2050 mAh
|
2350 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(48 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortext A9
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
N/A
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
187 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
62.66 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
146.2 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
77.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
10.4 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2050 mAh
|
2350 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
Google Play Store
|
N/A
|