|
68%
iVooMi Me3
₹6,800
(Out of Stock)
|
62%
Karbonn Frames S9
₹9,500
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iVooMi Me3 vs Karbonn Frames S9
Comparing the iVooMi Me3 vs Karbonn Frames S9 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iVooMi Me3 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Karbonn Frames S9 runs at 1.25 GHz, making iVooMi Me3 the better performer.
Display: Both iVooMi Me3 and Karbonn Frames S9 offer the same screen size of 5.2 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both iVooMi Me3 and Karbonn Frames S9 feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both iVooMi Me3 and Karbonn Frames S9 feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: iVooMi Me3 offers a higher battery capacity with 3000 mAh, while Karbonn Frames S9 offers 2900 mAh, making iVooMi Me3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both iVooMi Me3 and Karbonn Frames S9 offer the same internal storage of 16 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn Frames S9 receives a higher user rating of 4, while iVooMi Me3 has a rating of 3.4.
|
✕
iVooMi Me3
₹6,800
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Karbonn Frames S9
₹9,500
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
68%
|
62%
|
Release Date
|
07 Sep, 2017
|
03 May, 2018
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
MediaTek MT6737M
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.25 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP + 8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
2900 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.4/5
(14,290 ratings)
|
4/5
(376 ratings)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 07, 2017
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
MediaTek MT6737M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 1.25 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T720 MP2
|
Mali-T720 MP1
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB
|
RAM Type
|
DDR3
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
16:9
|
Pixel Density
|
282 ppi
|
282 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
66.64 %
|
69.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
150 mm
|
148.4 mm
|
Width
|
74.4 mm
|
72 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.0 mm
|
7.8 mm
|
Weight
|
158 grams
|
139 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.01µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|